REVITALIZATION OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BASED ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN CENTRE FOR CLIMATE CHANGE AND POLICY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Kirsfianti Linda Ginoga

Abstract


Government Regulation No. 12/2014 and Ministry of Forestry Regulation No. 92/Menhut-II/2014 about the types and rates of non-tax tariff from Ministry of Forestry are the underlying motivations to revitalize services in research and development through information technology (IT). Revitalization policy is expected to increase effectiveness, efficiency, value added, professionalism, governance, as well as avoid overlapping research on climate changes in forestry. Using gap and stakeholder analysis, it reveals that a set of technical and administrative tools such as an improved web design and various of SOPs for monitoring and evaluation of services are still needed. Stakeholder analysis through several focus group discussions also shows that there are many stakeholders who are promoters of revitalization that require intensive cooperation, followed by defenders who require periodical information. Stakeholder latent in this program is relatively very minimal. Observation in Centre for Climate Change and Policy Research and Development reveals that in the short term the number of users of services and activities of research and development after revitalization policy in September 2014 increased 143 and 400 percent compared to the same month in 2013, while in October 2013 increased by 300 and 500 percent, respectively compared to October 2014.


Keywords


Revitalization policy; scientific product, IT; stakeholder; gap analysis.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Biro Perencanaan. (2014). Pokok-pokok pikiran dan kegiatan Renstra 2015-2019. Bahan presentasi Rapat Koordinasi RPI Badan Litbang Kehutanan.Yogyakarta, 27 Juli 2014.

Ekawati, S. (2014). Kajian kebijakan Kementerian Kehutanan. Bahan presentasi FGD Kebijakan dan Tatakelola Kehutanan. Bogor, 14 Oktober 2014.

Freeman, R.E. (2010). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Grimble, R. (1998). Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management. Socio-economic methodologies. Best practice guidelines. Chatham, UK: Natural Resources Institute.

Hernowo, B. (2014). Kebutuhan riset nasional pasca 2014. Bahan presentasi Rapat Koordinasi RPI Litbang Kehutanan. Lido, 27 Maret 2013.

Kementerian Keuangan. (2014). Pembiayaan RAN GRK 2012-2020. Bahan presentasi FGD Ekonomi dan Kebijakan REDD+. Bogor.

Reed, M.S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubaek, K., Morris, J., . . . Stringer, L.C. (2009). Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management Journal of Environmental Management, 2009(90), 16.

Ribot, J.C. & Peluso, N.L. (2003). A Theory of Access*. Rural Sociology, 68(2), 153-181.

Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan No. 40/Menhut-II/ 2010 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Kementerian Kehutanan.

Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan No. P.02/MenhutII/2010 tentang Sistem Informasi Kehutanan.

Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan No. P.7/Menhut-II/ 2011 tentang Pelayanan Informasi Publik di Lingkungan Kementerian Kehutanan.

Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan No. 92/Menhut-II/ 2014 tentang Tata Cara dan Jenis dan Tarif Atas Jenis Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak pada Badan Litbang Kehutanan.

Peraturan Pemerintah No. 12 tahun 2010 tentang Jenis dan Tarif Penerimaan Bukan Pajak di Kementerian.

Peraturan Presiden No. 61 tahun 2011 tentang Rencana Aksi Nasional Penurunan Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca.

Undang-Undang No. 18 tahun 2002 tentang Sistem Nasional Penelitian, Pengembangan, dan Penerapan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2015.12.2.143-158

Copyright (c) 2015 Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan