THE DYNAMICS OF FOREST HEGEMONY IN INDONESIA
Abstract
Hegemony means as a victory for the dominant group that is controlled by the mechanism of consensus (consent). This article attempts to understand the dynamics of state and community relationships regarding the political dynamics of the mastery of forest resources from the feudalism era to the post-colonial era. This research was carried out by using the qualitative analytic approach with literature research method. The results of the study showed that during colonial era, the state hegemony over forests was mainly to maintain its domain against the forest, and it correlates with the use of alliance between the colonial state and local rulers. In the perspective of Gramscian, the existing national political law over the forest is much influenced by the Indonesian organic intellectuals who inherited the ideology of Domainverklaring. The present social forestry program is not actually a counter-hegemonic (victory) of society over state hegemony in forest areas that has been taken place since colonial times, but rather to reinforce state hegemony over forests. To avoid it from triggering a humanitarian crisis, the solution then will depend on the country's ability to uphold justice in forest resources management.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. (BenBrewster, Ed.). New York: Monthly Review Press.
Althusser, L. (2015). Ideologi dan aparatus ideologi negara. (C. H. Pontoh, Ed.). Tangerang Selatan: IndoProgress.
Arizona, Y. (2014). Konstitusionalisme agraria. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.
Blommfield, M. (2012). Is forest certification a hegemonic force? The FSC and its challengers. Journal of Environment & Development, 21(4), 391–413. https://doi. org/10.1177/1070496512449822.
Boomgaard, P. (2014). Forest management and exploitation in colonial Java 1677-1897. Forest & Conservation, 36. https://doi. org/10.2307/3983978
Bromley, S. (1991). American hegemony on world oil: The industry, world system, and economy. Great Britain: The Pennsylvania University Pres. Retrieved 9 March 2016 from http://jed. sagepub.com
Budiman, A. (2006). Kebebasan, negara, pembangunan, kumpulan tulisan 1965-2005. Jakarta: Pustaka Alfabet.
Budiningsih, K., Ekawati, S., & Handoyo. (2016). Dinamika kebijakan penggunaan kawasan hutan: Sebuah analisa isi perubahan kebijakan penggunaan kawasan hutan. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 13(1), 13–28.
Budiono, R. (2017). Analisis hubungan negara dan masyarakat dalam pengelolaan sumber daya hutan (Studi kasus Kabupaten Pelalawan Provinsi Riau) (Disertasi). Bogor: Sekolah Pasca Sarjana - Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Carey, P. (2012). Kuasa ramalan; Pangeran Diponegoro dan akhir tatanan lama di Jawa. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Carey, P., & Haryadi, S. (2016). Korupsi dalam silang sejarah Indonesia dari Daendels (1808-1811) sampai reformasi. Depok: Komunitas Bambu.
Cascão, A. (2008). Ethiopia – Challenges to Egyptian hegemony in the Nile basin. Water Policy, 10(2), 13–28.
Dephut. (1986). Sejarah kehutanan Indonesia I periode pra sejarah-tahun 1942, periode II-III periode tahun 1942-1983. Jakarta: Departemen Kehutanan.
Dunggio, I., & Gunawan, H. (2009). Telaah sejarah kebijakan pengelolan taman nasional di Indonesia. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 6(1), 43–56.
Effendy, T. (2008). Bujang tan domang, sastra lisan orang Petalangan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Hendarto. (1993). Mengenal konsep hegemoni Gramsci: Dalam diskursus kemasyarakatan dan kemanusiaan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hermosilla, A. C., & Fay, C. (2006). Memperkokoh pengelolaan hutan Indonesia melalui pembaruan sistem penguasaan tanah : Pemasalahan dan kerangka tindakan. Bogor: World Agroforestry Centre.
Kartodihardjo, H. (2012). Hutan negara di dalam wilayah masyarakat hukum adat. Materi Saksi Ahli dalam Gugatan Permohonan Uji Materiil UU Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 di Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Lansing, D. M. (2014). Discourse and the production of territorial hegemony: Indigenous peoples, the United Fruit Company and the capitalist state in Costa Rica, 1872-1916. Journal of Historical Geography, 45, 38–49. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jhg.2014.04.001
Lee, J. W. Y., & Tang, W.-S. (2016). The hegemony of the real estate industry: Redevelopment of government/institution or community (G/IC) land in Hong Kong. Urban Studies, (July 2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016679607
Leirissa, R. (1999). VOC sebagai sejarah sosial. Jurnal Wacana, 1 (1), 70–84.
Machmur, A. S. (1999). Dinamika proses lahirnya Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan. (A. S. Machmur & W. Sutoyo, Eds.). Jakarta: Departemen Kehutanan dan Perkebunan.
Mahmud, A., Satria, A., & Kinseng, R. A. (2015). Analisis sejarah dan pendekatan sentralisasi dalam pengelolaan Taman Nasional Bali Barat. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 12(2), 15–172.
Menga, F. (2016). Reconceptualizing hegemony: The circle of hydro-hegemony. Water Policy, 18(2), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.2166/ wp.2015.063
Nitayadnya, I. W. (2013). Muatan politik propaganda kolonial Jepang. Atavisme, 16(Desember), 215–227. Retrieved 18 August 2017 from http://download.portalgaruda.org/article. hp?article=392315&val=8083&title=Muatan Politik Propaganda Kolonial Jepang dalam Cerpen dan Drama Karya Idrus
Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2003). Hukum dan masyarakat dalam transisi menuju hukum yang responsif. Jakarta: HuMA.
Nurjaya, N. (2005). Sejarah hukum pengelolaan hutan di Indonesia. Jurisprudence, 2(1), 35–55. Retrieved 18 August 2017 from https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/bitstream/ handle/11617/1036/3. NYOMAN NURJAYA. pdf;sequence=1
Nurrochmat, D., Hasan, M., Suharjito, D., Hadianto, A., Ekayani, M., Sudarmalik, … Ryandi. (2012). Ekonomi politik kehutanan. Mengurai mitos dan fakta pengelolaan hutan. Bogor: IPB Press.
Nurrochmat, D. R. (2017). Strategi kebijakan pembangunan kehutanan dan lingkungan berkelanjutan. (Orasi Ilmiah Guru Besar). Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Onghokham. (2014). Runtuhnya Hindia Belanda. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Parlindungan, A. (1993). Beberapa masalah dalam UUPA (Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria). Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Patria, N., & Arief, A. (2009). Antonio Gramsci: Negara dan hegemoni. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Peluso, N. L. (2006). Hutan kaya, rakyat melarat: Penguasaan sumber daya dan perlawanan di Jawa. Yogyakarta: Khopalindo. Peluso, N. L., & Vandergeest, P. (1995). Territorialization and state power in Thailand. Journal Theory and Society, 24 (3), 385–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993352.
Perkins, H. A. (2011). Geoforum Gramsci in green: Neoliberal hegemony through urban forestry and the potential for a political ecology of praxis. Journal Geoforum - Elsevier, 42, 558–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. geoforum.2011.05.001
Prabowo, S. A., Basuni, S., & Suharjito, D. (2010). Konflik tanpa henti: Permukiman dalam kawasan Taman Nasional Halimun Salak. JMHT, XVI(3), 137–142.
Pranoto, S. (2010). Jawa (Bandit-bandit pedesaan). Studi historis. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Rajagukguk, E. (1995). Hukum agraria, pola penguasaan tanah dan kebutuhan hidup. Jakarta: Chandra Pratama.
Ricklefs, M. (2008). Sejarah Indonesia modern 12002008. Jakarta: Serambi Ilmu.
Ridho, D., Adi, I., Purwadianto, A., Maryudi, A., & Thomas, J. (2017). Shifting contestation into cooperation: Strategy to incorporate different interest of actors in medicinal plants in Meru Betiri National Park, Indonesia. Journal Forest Policy and Economics, 83(August), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.005
Rositah, E. (2005). Kemiskinan desa sekitar hutan dan penanggulangannya (Studi kasus Kabupaten Malinau) CIFOR Governance Brief No. 14.
Scale up. (2012). Laporan tahunan (ringkas) konflik sumber daya alam di Riau Tahun 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011. Bogor: Scale Up dan IMN.
Scattergood, W. (2004). Dynamic hegemony: Power, cooptation, and subversion in the clash between international trade, security, and environmental protection". Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebe. Canada.
Schlegel, S. (1972). Grounded research di dalam ilmuilmu sosial. Darusalam Banda Aceh (ID): PLPIIS.
Soekiman, D. (2011). Kebudayaan Indis: Dari zaman kompeni sampai revolusi. Jakarta (ID): Komunitas Bambu.
Stephan, B. (2011). The Power in carbon a neogramscian explanation for the EU‘s adoption of emissions trading (ISSN 1869-5485 No. 4). Jerman. Retrieved 18 August 2017from www. klimacampus.de
Sudarmalik. (2014). Ekonomi politik pembangunan hutan tanaman industri. (Disertasi). Bogor (ID) : Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Sugiono, M. (2006). Kritik Antonio Gramsci terhadap pembangunan dunia ketiga. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sunyoto, A. (2015). Kolonial Belanda dan kekerasan budaya pasca 1926-1927. Retrieved 18 August 2017 from http://www.nu.or.id/post/ read/64388/ %09kolonialisme- Belanda-dankekerasan-budaya-pasca-1926-1927
Supriyadi. (2013). Hukum agraria kehutanan : Aspek hukum pertanahan dalam pengelolaan hutan negara. Jakarta (ID): Rajawali Press.
Tamagola, T. (2006). Republik kapling. Yogyakarta (ID): Resit Book.
Vandergeest, P. (1996). Mapping nature: Territorialization of forest rights in Thailand. Society & Natural Resources, 9(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929609380962
Warner, J. (2008). Contested hydrohegemony: Hydraulic control and security in Turkey. Journal Water Alternatives, 1(2), 271–288. Retrieved 8 July 2017 from http://www. water-alternatives.org/index.php/volume1/ v1issue2/32-a1-2-6/file
Wollenberg, E., Belcher, B., Sheil, D., Dewi, S., & Moeliono, M. (2004). Mengapa kawasan hutan penting bagi penanggulangan kemiskinan di Indonesia. Governance Brief, 4(i). Bogor: CIFOR.
Zed, M. (2004). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Jakarta : Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Zeitoun, M., Eid-Sabbagh, K., Talhami, M., & Dajani, M. (2013). Hydro-hegemony in the upper Jordan waterscape: Control and use of the flows. Journal Water Alternatives, 6(1), 86– 106.
Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony - A framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Journal Water Policy, 8(5), 435–460. https://doi.org/10.2166/ wp.2006.054
Zinzani, A., & Menga, F. (2017). The Circle of hydro-hegemony between riparian states, development policies and borderlands: Evidence from the Talas waterscape (Kyrgyzstan-Kazakhstan). Journal Geoforum - Elsevier, 85(July), 112–121. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.07.019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2018.15.2.113-126
Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
